From the Arkansas Statehouse...

As tobacco tax bill is filed, Beebe stresses its breadth.

In Cigarette Tax, Mike Beebe on 26 January 2009 at 1:56 pm

On the heels of this morning’s filing of the cigarette tax bill, HB1204, Gov. Beebe and over a dozen state legislators held a rally at Children’s Hospital to stress the urgency of its passage. Not only will the bill fund a new trauma center, Beebe told a packed room; it will also pay for numerous other health programs that will help Arkansans across the state.

Beebe’s emphasis on the totality of his proposal is an important step toward passing the legislation. Legislators opposed to raising the cigarette tax have suggested that a trauma center can be paid for by such means as raising fines for drunken driving. By presenting the tax package as a means to fund numerous programs, and not just a trauma center, the governor’s office may make it much more difficult for lawmakers to say no.

One such lawmaker is Senate President Pro Tem Bob Johnson, who professed his support for the increased tax at today’s rally. “I stand before you as someone who has never supported a tobacco tax,” he said. “I am full-bore for it this session.”

Beebe also tried to correct the perception circulating around the legislature that a trauma center would lard only a few Little Rock hospitals. People in rural areas would benefit from the system, he said. There will be no new hospitals, just increased resources at existing ones. And a trauma system will consist of more than a few hospitals. Though a main one will be in Little Rock, Arkansas Surgeon General Joe Thompson has said that he expects as many as 40 hospitals to participate.

(Read on for the bill’s prospects and its new provisions on smokeless tobacco.)

Beebe acknowledged that getting enough votes to pass the bill — 75 percent in both houses — will be a struggle. He did not have kind words for cigarette companies, whose lobbying strategies he derided. He encouraged the crowd to watch The Insider, a 1999 movie about the nationwide tobacco settlement, in order to get an idea of how the companies operate.

At present the bill lists 28 supporters in the house and two in the Senate. Its provisions — including the 56-cents-per-pack increase — are subject to revision in committee.

Worth watching is the bill’s hike on the smokeless tobacco tax. The current version distinguishes ‘moist snuff’ — dip that comes in a tin can — from other non-cigarette tobacco products. Dip would be taxed at either 83 cents per ounce or at 32 percent of the manufacturer’s price, whichever is higher. (This formula would seem to take advantage of an industry dispute, which I described earlier, that pits generic companies versus name brands such as Copenhagen.) The bill also contains a tax increase for tobacco products that are neither dip nor cigarettes.

Finally, a note on terminology: previously I’ve used the term chaw rather loosely to describe any tobacco product put in the mouth and spit out. The law is more specific than I am.

  1. When are our representatives gonna start passing some priority legislation to prevent the pollution caused by these gas drilling companies? This should be a priority of every Arkansas citizen. We should all call our state congressmen and senators and demand they start looking out for the citizens of this state. Our state is becoming the “Un Natural State”.

  2. This is a very informative article by Mary Jo Long, Esq.entitled ” What Local Governments Can Do To Minimize the Negative Impacts of Gas Drilling”.

    Local government officials are only beginning to hear about the unanticipated consequences of gas drilling on their community. These impacts will cost the local government money and thus affect all of us whether we signed a lease or own any land.
     Town government’s biggest budget item is its road/highway department. Gas drilling affects townand county roads because truck traffic carrying 800,000 to 4 million gallons of water per well and again per fracking wears out roads.  Air quality problems and noise from 24/7 drilling as well as the noise from compressor stations will impact on health when the drilling is near a school, hospital, nursing home or village.  County/town emergency and health care services will experience increased demands. This can be due to the increase in major on-the-job injuries which happen in gas drilling ,or the naturally
    occurring radium-226 and 228 and radon that concentrates on drilling equipment.
     Fire fighting needs from chemicals fires and gas eruptions which require different kinds of responses than brush and house fires.
     There is the additional use of schools for families of drilling workers and the impact of increased demand for rental housing which drives up the price for local renters.  And there is the impact on water systems, including municipal water, underground aquifer, individual wells, as well as our ponds, lakes and rivers. Those impacts include both the sheer volume of water being pumped out of current water sources to use in the drilling process and the
    occasional damage to water systems (wells, aquifers, ground water) when the drilling fluids get into those systems.
    The safety and welfare of the general population are not protected by the best-crafted leases, nor by higher levels of government.
    Local government needs to act to protect the general population. Federal laws exempt the gas industry from The Clean Air Act, The Clean Water Act, and The Safe Drinking Water Act. The State Department of Environmental Conservation claims they are protecting us, saying “Our regulations are as strong as the
    federal government’s”. But that is saying zero. The DEC says that the Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Law precludes the enforcement of local laws in the area of oil and gas regulation except local roads and real property taxes.(Environmental Conservation Law §23-0303(2).)
    However, this fails to note that gas drilling has to follow all the laws that aren’t specific to gas drilling. For example, we are not precluded from enforcing speed limits, negligent conduct and other legal rights. Moreover this law has not faced legal challenge since 1992, when the scale of gas drilling was much
    The DEC is trying to discourage local governments from using moratoriums to delay the drilling until the Towns put needed protections in place. Several communities in Sullivan County have nevertheless passed 6 month moratoriums. The gas companies had years to make their business plans; local government should have a year to make plans to prevent the hidden costs of drilling to be borne by the community rather than the gas companies. Some lawyers say that a moratorium probably won’t be upheld if the gas companies challenge them. These lawyers often represent landowners or gas companies in negotiating leases. Their interest is to
    have the drilling happen as soon as possible so they get their fees sooner. But the fact is that municipal lawyers use moratoriums regularly to allow their communities to study, investigate and determine whether new laws are needed to minimize the negative impact of some development. A Moratorium does not
    prevent the gas drilling indefinitely. It only pauses it for a reasonable time while the local government considers what, if any, rules, bonding requirements, etc. need to be put in place.
    ECL §23-0303(2) also doesn’t mean we can’t delay the gas drilling until we do pass local laws that are allowed such as on roads and taxes. Just because we cannot stop it from happening does not
    mean we have to sit idly by while our safety and health take a back seat to the gas industry’s profit margins.
    What should local governments do before the gas drilling starts?
    Develop a land and water inventory guide by collecting baseline data. Other communities with experience in hosting gas drilling say that is crucial because you will not be able to prove damages to water, air, etc if you cannot show what the status was before the drilling. Implement community impact fees for schools and roads, e.g. assess taxes of number of trucks/day and weight.
    Require bonding for pits and reservoirs. The 7 to 15 chemicals used in the fracking solution will either be trucked out or left to evaporate in reservoirs. There should be a special license to handle hazardous waste. Require steel linings rather than plastic linings for the open pits that hold drilling water which contains various chemicals, biocides and fracking fluids Require reclamation bonds. Bonding to plug abandoned wells, which costs $15,000-$20,000 if there is no contamination. More than $100,000 if there is a spill/contamination. Require emission monitoring of road dust and ozone from flaring. Implement a “reverse 911” system where there is a way to call/alert people of a chemical spill or
    fire. Define mandatory set backs from schools, houses, roads and streams as we would from porn shops, rock concerts or any (other) pollution-emitting industry. Enact stormwater rules . Weeds and herbicides have presented problems in other states where gas
    drilling occurs. Since the federal government has exempted gas drilling from stormwater runoff regulations, local governments have to enact their own stormwater rules. Prepare plans to deal with impacts arising from changing property values. Pass Municipal watershed ordinances. The taking of water for drilling is not a one-shot deal. The industry will have 3 to 10 fracturing episodes to fully exploit each well.

     Please see for a range of topics relating gas-drilling to your health at
     Read the news on gas drilling at
     Join the discussion group at

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: